Skip to content
Samyak IAS - Best IAS and RAS Coaching in Jaipur

WHY Trump Backtracked on 20% Hormuz fee plan

US President Donald Trump withdrew his proposal to impose a 20% fee on commercial cargo for safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz, replacing it with proposed trade and investment deals with Gulf countries.

The Questions Over the Plan

  • The proposal lacked clarity regarding its implementation, calculation and legality under international law.
  • The International Maritime Organization maintained that mandatory tolls cannot be imposed for transit through an international strait.
  • It was unclear whether the US could guarantee the safety of commercial vessels in the region.
  • A fee on total cargo value would have sharply increased shipping costs and commodity prices.
  • The proposal contradicted the traditional US position supporting freedom of navigation.

The U-turn

  • Gulf countries dependent on the Strait for energy exports may have opposed the proposed fee.
  • Concerns over global energy prices, shipping costs and navigational freedom may have influenced the reversal.
  • Trump proposed trade and investment deals with Gulf States instead of the 20% fee.

Contested Routes Through the Strait of Hormuz

  • Ships were using either routes near Oman’s coast or routes authorised by Iran.
  • Iran reportedly targeted vessels that did not use its designated routes.
  • The US encouraged ships to use routes closer to Oman’s coastline.

Control of Hormuz

  • The fee controversy reflected the broader US-Iran struggle for influence over the Strait of Hormuz.
  • An interim US-Iran agreement had promised to keep the Strait open for navigation.
  • Vessel traffic increased after the agreement but remained below pre-conflict levels.
  • Iran continued regulating shipping routes and requiring vessels to seek permission.
  • Differences over the interpretation of the agreement created fresh tensions.

How It Could Have Hit India

  • India, as a major importer of West Asian oil and gas, would have faced significantly higher energy costs.
  • A 20% fee on oil priced at $75 per barrel could have raised its landed price by about $15 per barrel.
  • Every $1 increase in crude oil prices can raise India’s annual oil import bill by up to $2 billion.
  • The fee could have added nearly $9 billion annually to India’s oil import costs.
  • Imports of LNG, LPG, fertilisers and other industrial inputs could also have become more expensive.
     
Share
Back to all articles
Contact Us